Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 01.07.2025 05:11
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Thank you.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
What would happen if the Earth stopped spinning for one minute?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
What’s next?
Just in the last 5 years:
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
How can we get rid of viral fever naturaly?
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
The dancing monk: Why mature people don’t chase total control - Big Think
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Post-COVID Fatigue: Is Your Gut To Blame? - SciTechDaily
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
2 dead in Las Vegas Strip shooting, with suspect known but not yet arrested, police say - ABC News
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sarepta reports second patient death after treatment with Duchenne gene therapy - statnews.com